<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Article Tag Suite 1.1//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         article-type="Research Paper"
         xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Divyadaan</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Divyadaan</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">applied</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0972-2211</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Fr. Ian Pinto</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">DJPE1370007</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>METHOD IN SOCIOLOGY On the Possibility of a &apos;Consultational&apos; Sociology of Religion Based on the Work of Jung</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Paul</surname>
            <given-names>Nirmal Savio</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">DJPE</aff>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-29">
        <month>04</month>
        <day>29</day>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>37</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>73</fpage>
      <lpage>106</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons license.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Here,  we propose, via Jung, a  methodological shift in Sociology of  Religion (SoR). We seek an invariant non-reductionist method in SoR regarding the depths of  religious  experience.  We  hypothesise  that,  encouraged  by  Taylor&apos;s characterisation  of  secularisation,  taking  the  authentic  subjectivity  (in  the Lonerganian sense) of the sociological investigator of religion as starting-point, and the consultational recommendation of Wheeldon as the interaction paradigm, we would have a prototypical methodological toolbox for a non-condescending approach  in  SoR.  The  proposed  approach  evades  the  trap  of  overarching narratives, while retaining commitment to scientific rigour, without discarding the existing theoretical heritage of SoR.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>Carl Jung</kwd>
        <kwd>Sociology of Religion</kwd>
        <kwd>non-reductionism</kwd>
        <kwd>religious experience</kwd>
        <kwd>secularization</kwd>
        <kwd>Charles Taylor</kwd>
        <kwd>authentic subjectivity</kwd>
        <kwd>Bernard Lonergan</kwd>
        <kwd>interaction paradigm</kwd>
        <kwd>sociological methodology</kwd>
        <kwd>scientific rigor</kwd>
        <kwd>non-condescending approach</kwd>
        <kwd>methodological shift</kwd>
        <kwd>religious studies</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <!-- Full article body not available in metadata-only JATS export. See PDF/HTML galley. -->
  </body>
  <back/>
</article>
